BACKWARDS
FROM IRAQ TO 911
MIHOP OR LIHOP OR GCN
By: Nathanael
There is a
psychological game that one has to play when making a conclusion or deduction about what
happened on and before 911.
As in a courtroom or crime scene examination, we have to think backwards
from the facts or evidence at hand, as would a criminal investigator. Thinking this
way can be sufficient to shatter an alibi, explanation or the "official
story" about 911. The Perpetrators of 911 know that the general public does not
generally apply this frame of mind. But the tide is turning, as shown by the fact that 42% of the American people believe there was a cover
up and an additional 10% are not sure.
It is now being reported that the
Intelligence Community smelled that “something was coming” and tried to give
warning to BushCo. For example:
Two Months Before 9/11, an Urgent Warning to Rice
October 1, 2006, Washington Post
9/11 Panel
Members Weren’t Told of Meeting
October 2, 2006, New York Times
Tenet
told 9/11 panel that he warned Rice of Al Qaeda
October 3, 2006, Boston Globe/Washington Post
Rumsfeld, Ashcroft received warning of al Qaida attack before
9/11
October
02, 2006
BushCo likely already knew that
“something was coming” because it was going to be part of a larger scheme. Condi
Rice and others do not want to acknowledge having received these warnings prior to 911 in
order to preserve plausible deniability.
BushCo having had substantial notification before 911 from the Intelligence Community
of a coming terrorist threat in conjunction with the complete failure of the military air
defenses, NORAD responses and FAA procedures on 911 leaves only three possible
conclusions. Either BushCo...
- MIHOP (made it happen on purpose) or
- LIHOP (let it happen on purpose) or
- is guilty of Gross Criminal Negligence
and dereliction of duty in failing to protect the nation when directly warned about a soon
to come terrorist attack.
The unknown details of who did what and how on 911 do
matter but not in order to come the conclusion that BushCo is
directly responsible for 911. |
Thinking backwards from the reality
of the Iraq War and the Global War On Terror being the end goal, then the blood rage
of the American people was requisite via a New Pearl Harbor on 911.
Motive =>
GWBush wants war in Iraq and in other places
Opportunity => 911
creates a blood rage in the public mind that then gives
him license to warmonger as he pleases
Only one of the above three possibilities, MIHOP or LIHOP or GCN,
makes any sense.
Would you allow a ragtag
bunch of Arabs with box cutters who are incapable of flying sophisticated airliners
to have any chance of failing to complete the "terror attacks"? ... to say
nothing of gambling that a fully functional US air defense network would not stop the hijacked planes? LIHOP
makes no sense.
If one assumes that gross criminal negligence on the part of Rice, Rumsfeld, et al
was at work, then the complete break down of the air defense network is ludicrous.
Why? Because the trillions of dollars spent and the incredible competence of the US air defenses are all
always on the job. There are preset standard operating procedures, practiced thousands of
times, which are never not in operation but did not perform on 9/11/01. Do you
remember the Payne Stewart intercept in 1999? US Air Force jets were dispatched
in less than 30 minutes after the ground controllers lost radio communications with his
Learjet. GCN makes no sense.
Control and certainty of the outcome were mandatory in order to bring about the public
psychology needed to go to war in Iraq and bring about the GWOT.
MIHOP is the only scenario that makes sense.
The universal desire by radical Muslims to attack the Great Satan - America - is ever
present but was used in this case as an easily swallowed cover story.
GWBush and his minions have been exposed and serious trouble is brewing.
Will the Congress find a spine and pursue immediate impeachment?
Not likely since counterbalancing blackmail surely exists.
The solution is the
direct criminal indictment and prosecution of BushCo. The dilemma is finding an
attorney with the courage to actually follow his oath and file the proper charges in a
Federal Court. If there is such a legal-creature and Judge Anna Diggs Taylor has proper
venue and jurisdiction, please consider pursuing BushCo in her courtroom.
"Naturally
the common people don't want war: Neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is
understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and
it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a
fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the
people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to
do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of
patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country."
--Hermann Göring at the Nuremberg Trials 1946
Ephesians 5:11-13 (New American Standard
Bible)
11 Do not
participate in the unfruitful deeds of darkness, but instead even expose them;
12 for it is
disgraceful even to speak of the things which are done by them in secret.
13 But all
things become visible when they are exposed by the light, for everything that becomes
visible is light.
"Published originally at EtherZone.com :
republication allowed with this notice and hyperlink intact."
Nathanael is a self-employed engineer
and lives in metropolitan area of Dallas, Texas. He had only ever been a life long
registered Republican but changed to the Constitution Party in May of 2004. He is a
regular columnist for Ether Zone.
Nathanael can be reached at nathanael4551@yahoo.com
Published in the October 6, 2006 issue of Ether Zone.
Copyright © 1997 - 2006 Ether
Zone.
We invite your
comments on this article in our forum! |
