CRITICS ARE WRONG
AS THIS LAUGHABLE EXAMPLE PROVES!
By: Don Boys, Ph.D.
of my angry critics who write me are unreasonable, unclear, uncivil, and uninformed people
who absolutely refuse to deal with facts in my columns, so they go on the attack like a
junk-yard dog. In fact, many of them are mean as a junk-yard dog. Of course, attacks are
easier to produce than answers.
often begin with questioning my training and that is a sure sign that they will not deal
with the disputed issues. It really doesnt matter if I purchased my Ph.D. at the old
defunct Montgomery Wards (I think doctorates are cheaper at Sears), they must answer my charges. Of course, it
is much easier to nitpick and stonewall rather than deal with truth.
of them resort to foul and filthy language. I seldom read them because I dont want
to clutter and dirty my mind with such garbage. It seems the minds of vocal liberals are
like a race horse; they run best on a dirt track.
course, they have a right to point out my typos. In
a recent column I mistyped a mans name using an e rather than the
correct i. However, I used it correctly three other times. I also had
judged instead of judge but most of my readers figured that out;
however, the haters were so incompetent or filled with hate that they could not (or would
not) see it. Of course, all liberals have glazed-over eyes. That goes with their
over-hyped and over-priced Bachelors degree from
Ivy League University!
told my editor (who doubles as my wife) who missed my typos that it must never happen again. I must never, never ever have
another misteak in any of my columns or books. She will be in big troubel if she misses
another topo. Count on it!
my critics dont like my using so many exclamation points; but then, I write so many
shocking statements that I would be negligent if I did not use them!!
a person who identified herself as Dr. L must have been smoking those funny
cigarettes when she wrote me. Of course, she did not provide her last name. I have assumed
the writer is female:
Boys is a radical nut job. He is full of hate (sic) he is a little hitler. (sic) His talk
of hate is why he is no longer a State Representative.
He is along the line with Michele Bachman who feel (sic) people can be cured
for (sic) homosexuality. Your research is also wrong (sic) look at any adoption site and
they will state same sex homes raise well adjusted (sic)
children. You are also full of hate (sic) your words are full a (sic) vulgar assumptions.
Would Jesus say anything like that?
Im not sure what Jesus would say, but He would write a better paragraph than that!
will permit my readers to identify her many grammatical errors and I will deal with the
substance or lack of substance in her diatribe. She
did what most of my critics do: they refuse to deal with the book or column and attack me
as being a radical nut job. Every informed person knows that most of the nut
jobs were conceived, born, reared, and educated from the left. In fact, they refuse to
ever turn right, so they always go around in circlesto the left, of course. No
wonder liberals are dizzy dodos, and like dodos, maybe they will soon be extinct! They
often have a knee-jerk reaction to me and of course, its always the left knees that
she accuses me of being full of hate, but she cant know what Im
full of. (I permitted my editor to let pass this one time that sentence ending with a
preposition.) When critics have an absence of substantive complaints, they always use a
four letter word, hate or love. While love is one of the most
important attributes to have, almost without exception it is not loving to permit people
to believe a lie without revealing the truth to them.
is a fact that everyone needs to understand: truth always trumps love. Exception might be
made for issues of emotional cruelty. A
physician who refuses to tell a patient the facts (truth) of his health is a monster. Same
if a lawyer refuses to reveal the truth to a client.
the hate attack, I am, of course, a little hitler. She
wouldnt even give me a capital H in Hitler.
then shows that she is uninformed about homosexuality: homosexuals can be
cured if they desire it as the evidence proves. However, that is not
politically correct to admit, so liberals pretend that their version of truth
is the correct one. Of course, it is a perversion of truth which means liberals are
almost embarrassed to keep pointing out her many errors but she does not know the current
research that clearly reveals that children reared in homosexual homes are much more
dysfunctional than those in normal homes with a father and mother. The good doctor needs
to read more than the New York Times. In the
last few days, two more university studies were published supporting my contention. Of
course, the media and leftist homosexual-promoters are livid and have attacked the
studies. So what else is new?
wrote about my vulgar assumptions; however, I have no idea what she meant by
that. Oh, by the way, liberals are terrible writers and write books that no one reads but
are displayed on a few coffee tables in San Francisco homes.
then asked, Would Jesus say anything like that? Like what? As I said, liberals
have trouble making themselves clear. But then, that might be good!
my critic assures us that animals show signs of homosexuality; however, that is not true
as I illustrated with the penguins, Buddy and Pedro, at the Toronto zoo. Animals may
show signs of what some call homosexuality, but it is simply
normal animal activity when they are in heat. They will attack a chair to relieve
themselves. No, animals do not practice perversion; only humans do that.
close with her incredible closing paragraph: People (sic) don't believe this persons
(sic) words of hate, (sic) she (sic) is going against what or (sic) lord and savior wants
us to do and that is to LOVE each other. We all sin (sic) we hate sin but love the sinner.
This person shows her (sic) hate for anyone different. Dr. L
not sure what her last name is but it starts with an L, so it could stand for Liberal,
Loser, or maybe Loony. Then again, she may be a loony, losing Liberal. For sure, she needs an editor!
I read her closing statement, I became convinced it is impossible for an educated person
to write that way. Her mistakes are amazing, but her biggest foul-up was casting me as a
female at the end of her tirade. Im convinced the good doctor is dumb as
a box of rocks.
Dr. Don Boys is a
former member of the Indiana House of Representatives, author of 14 books, frequent guest
on television and radio talk shows, and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. His most
recent book is ISLAM: America's Trojan Horse! His new eBook, The God Haters is available
for $9.99 from www.thegodhaters.com.
He is a new columnist for Ether Zone.
Dr. Don Boys can be reached at: email@example.com
the June 25, 2012 issue of
Copyright © 1997 - 2012 Ether Zone.
We invite your
comments on this article in our forum!